Many of those reading this know what I refer to as "Downtown Street-Corner Preachers." Others may remember the Facebook Post from last summer after my first encounter with them. For the record, they do seem to believe that they are on a mission from God. They preach a kind of "in repentance... is your salvation," (See Isaiah 30:15, read it in context!) but as many of us well know... even though the words they preach seem like truth from God's word, it just doesn't sound quite right.
It had been a long day at work and I, while disembarking from the light-rail station, decided to take a stroll through Downtown last week. Sure enough, there they were preaching the same, message as always. "God hates your sin!" It's a message they proclaim over a listing of select sins according to the book Leviticus. They wear this listing on themselves like those of a "LIQUIDATION SALE" sign on a poor furniture store employee. When I saw them, a kind of fire flared up in me -- don't get me wrong, it wasn't so much anger as a desire to set things right -- so I approached one of the preachers.
It turned out that a nicely dressed, older gentleman had reached the preacher just before me. He was calm, collected, and not especially bothered by this wild eyed instrument of God's judgement. I walked up beside them and decided to listen a while as I waited my turn. This is more or less how the conversation went:
"Hello, brother," said the businessman to the preacher, "how are you?"
"I'M OKAY!" shouted the preacher for all to hear, "HOW ARE YOU???"
"I'm doing well," the business man quietly, for I could hardly hear him myself. "Say, why do you shout all the time?"
"I'M NOT SHOUTING! I'M PROCLAIMING, more like PREACHING!"
"Well I see that, but it's coming across as a little offensive, do you think you could tone it down a little?"
"NO, I DON'T BELIEVE I CAN DO THAT. YOU SEE, These people's SINS need to be EXPOSED through the LAW! Is it offensive? YES, because GOD's WORD is offensive to this culture of PHARISEES! It's a kind of RIGHTEOUS anger."
"Pardon me, sir." said the businessman very politely, "I'm a brother in the faith--"
"OH, that's GOOD!!!!!"
"Yes... er... right, I'm a brother in the faith and I'm still working through some of the sins that your preaching against. I don't claim perfection yet, but I'm working on it. Anyway, I just think you need to tone it down and be a little more polite."
"WELL, even JESUS had RIGHTEOUS ANGER TOO!"
"I understand that... in certain cases, but I just think you are coming off as offensive. I have to go now--"
The businessman then looked at me and smiled as though to say, Your turn! I shook his hand, and he sped on his way.
I can't really give you a step by step relay of what went on after that. But suffice it to say that within the verbal boxing match which ensued, I was interrupted, misunderstood, and accused of being a "PHARISEE!" as well as one who "BEARS BAD FRUIT!" After about 2 minutes of trying to make sense of the situation, another preacher joined and the two proceeded to ram me with scriptures... which seemed to have no discernible Biblical context. One of these Scriptures in particular was Romans 2:8 which I will get to in a bit.
After about five minutes, they decided they had enough of me and said, "This guy doesn't know what he's talking about!" As they hurriedly left to cross the street, I decided not to give up just yet. "Hey!" I shouted and stretched out my hand, "Thanks for talking with me, I really appreciate it." The second preacher hesitated only a moment, "Yeah... uh, no problem," and he shook my hand.
Now the story takes another turn, because on the journey home I saw an older, disheveled, gentleman holding a sign which read, "Just Need Food." I felt compelled towards him (which doesn't happen very often mind you) and said, "Hi! How are you?"
"Eh? What did you say son?" He answered.
"I said 'hoooow... aaarrreee.... yoooouuuu."
"Oh! Doing well, doing well."
"Is there anything I can do for you today?" It was amazing how naturally I formed those words. Only a moment before I felt so flabbergasted that I could hardly get a word out. Wouldn't you know it? Maybe it's because I work in customer/food service! Just goes to show that one never knows when his/her trade will can be used for God's purposes.
"Oh, well it's just food that I need," said the man.
"Okay," I said motioning with my left hand, "Target is right across the street. Can I get you some food?"
His eyes brightened up and the sound of that, "OH! Yes! That would be great!"
"Do you have any dietary needs, sir?"
"Well, I have diabetes, you know. So any kind of fruit... er... um... BANANAS! I could use some bananas!
Sure enough, I found myself grabbing two bunches of bananas and a cup of coffee, "With cream and Sweet&Low!" After bringing him his food and drink, I asked if I could pray for him.
"Ah, now that would be great, thank you," he said, bowing his head. I laid my hand on him and prayed something like this:
"Dear Father in Heaven. I thank you for stopping me to help my friend today. I pray that these things would be nourishing to his body. Lord, I also pray that you would continue to compel people of Truth to help him. Surround him with these people. In Jesus' name we pray. Amen!"
"Thank you, son. What is you name?"
"Jacob," I replied with a smile.
"Oh, well I'll remember that," he winked, "That's from the Bible!"
And it was true. What I did was from the Bible. In fact it was exactly what Jesus did in the Bible, and also what the real Pharisees refused to do: to see, to touch, and to provide for the poor in heart, health, and spirit... on a personal, day by day level.
Who are the real Pharisees of today? Well, Jesus described them as loud, burdensome, arrogant, deceitful, and overall hypocritical. Need I say more?
What is truly needed is people with sound conviction of the heart and mind to reach out and touch the people in this culture. For those of us with a heart for culture change, I think it starts right here, wherever here is for you.
Now that you have trekked through this amazing journey with me. Read Romans chapter 2. Remember the preachers used Romans 2:8 to justify their wrathful, angry preaching. I actually chuckled when I read the first few verses. Can you tell why? Read the whole chapter and always, always test the way people use the Word by putting it back into context!
Blessings!
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Thursday, June 13, 2013
He says, "I'm the Anti-Christ!" and I say... "Oh REALLY?"
Jose Luis de Jesus Miranda is his name, but merely claiming to be "Christ" is not enough for him. In fact, he claims to be The Anti-Christ. Now the Church has been arguing for generation's over who the Anti-Christ is going to be, but apparently, Miranda has answered the question for us all. For that matter, he takes pride in his Anti-Christ identity.
I encourage you to visit his website, look at his doctrinal "truths" and expose them with the True Word of God for yourself. If he does claim to be the Anti-Christ, then the scriptures he cites (*cough* out of context *cough*) ought to line up... Right?
However, when I did my scriptural analysis I found that he is either he is insane, delusional, or otherwise crazy. However, because of what I know from the First and Second Letters from John in the New Testament, I can logically conclude that he is an Anti-Christ of sorts. It should be a "no-brainer" for those who study the Bible on a daily basis. However, I haven't totally ruled out the delusional or insane possibilities as you might be able to see in the video below.
It is not really surprising to me that we are seeing figures like these popping up here and there. Jesus warned us that there would be such people, and his Apostles gave us quite a few warnings too.
Have you read the New Testament lately? I encourage you to read it along with the Old Testament. This way we build defenses against the deception of our world today as well as keep our hearts pure before God.
Check out this interview we found on YouTube from CNN. See if you can pick out the inconsistencies with the True Written Word of God.
See 1 John, 2 John, Hebrews 9, the book of Daniel, and the book of Revelation.
Read God's Word, Know God's Word, Memorize God's Word! I will be doing more research myself.
I encourage you to visit his website, look at his doctrinal "truths" and expose them with the True Word of God for yourself. If he does claim to be the Anti-Christ, then the scriptures he cites (*cough* out of context *cough*) ought to line up... Right?
However, when I did my scriptural analysis I found that he is either he is insane, delusional, or otherwise crazy. However, because of what I know from the First and Second Letters from John in the New Testament, I can logically conclude that he is an Anti-Christ of sorts. It should be a "no-brainer" for those who study the Bible on a daily basis. However, I haven't totally ruled out the delusional or insane possibilities as you might be able to see in the video below.
It is not really surprising to me that we are seeing figures like these popping up here and there. Jesus warned us that there would be such people, and his Apostles gave us quite a few warnings too.
Have you read the New Testament lately? I encourage you to read it along with the Old Testament. This way we build defenses against the deception of our world today as well as keep our hearts pure before God.
See 1 John, 2 John, Hebrews 9, the book of Daniel, and the book of Revelation.
Read God's Word, Know God's Word, Memorize God's Word! I will be doing more research myself.
Post Your Thoughts!
Sunday, May 26, 2013
So We Must Remember!
So We Must Remember!
By Jacob Hansen
We call it our nation, our home, and our place of rest.
But what has birthed it, refined it, preserved it?
But what has birthed it, refined it, preserved it?
Or does anything ring true in the Red, White and Blue?
Today we remember the many gone before
Uncles, Aunts, Great Fathers and Mothers
Children, parents, sisters and brothers.
But how do we remember the Reddest Blood spilled,
But how do we remember the Reddest Blood spilled,
Or the sacrifice of those who were felled.
Few recall the Pure Price of True Freedom,
Few recall the Pure Price of True Freedom,
.And fewer today know exactly what has Freed them.
So We Must Remember!
We no longer teach "Honor Thy Father and Mother,"
So We Must Remember!
We no longer teach "Honor Thy Father and Mother,"
When it comes to our fellow man we try not to bother.
But it is Honor and Courage that has made this nation great,
But it is Honor and Courage that has made this nation great,
To forget this erases the Blue from under 50 States.
And though the Stars are harder to forget.
And though the Stars are harder to forget.
Alaska and Montana sometimes, but surely not the rest.
We forget the Reddest Blood of those before,
The Purest White Freedom which they bought
And the Bluest Honor and Courage they bore,
And the Bluest Honor and Courage they bore,
To bring One out of Many they sought,
You might as well fly a flag without the Red,
without the White, and without the Blue.
But then our 50 states would separate, and so would I, and so would you.
So We Must Remember!
You might as well fly a flag without the Red,
without the White, and without the Blue.
But then our 50 states would separate, and so would I, and so would you.
So We Must Remember!
Monday, May 13, 2013
The Homo-Sexual Christian Possibility (?)
Today's post is short and sweet.
I thought about writing, but I think Ravi Answers the question pretty thoroughly.
What are your thoughts?
Thursday, May 9, 2013
Good World, Bad World?
I saw a Facebook post with a link to a recent blog about Red Skins Quarterback, Kirk Cousins. It contains a quote by Cousins about his reaction to teammate John McDonnell who has announced he is openly gay. I encourage you to check out the blog before reading my response:
http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast/post/_/id/51136/kirk-cousins-on-the-gay-teammate-question
I like what Cousins said, but there are a number of things about Dan Graziano's blog that doesn't amount to much sense.
1st) Using Cousins thoughts as a spring board, Graziano suggests that, "human beings" should not be, "the ones who decide what's the right way and the wrong way for people to live their lives." I didn't detect any of that in Cousins remarks, but let's unpack Graziano's statement.
How is society supposed to hold itself together if "human beings" refuse to set guidelines about what is right and wrong? What is to keep society from melting down into a chaotic moral system where your "right" is my "wrong" and my "wrong" is your "right?" I don't see how Graziano can make this statement ultimately because of what he says at the end of his article.
2nd) Grazino concludes his ideas about a "good" moral society by stating, "You don't have to have been raised on the New Testament to think that'd be a pretty nice world in which to live."
But how does he justify his "good world" from what he believes is a "bad world?" He can't, because he is assuming that it is self evident. But it is only self evident, because our nation was born and raised on the New Testament.
John Adams said this,
"[W]e have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. . . . Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."
Our Constitution only works for a moral and religious people. If society breaks down, and is breaking down, into one where the people refuse to call out what is Right and Wrong, then the Constitution is no longer relevant.
Why is morality necessary for Constitutional relevance? Because, the Constitution was written under the assumption that religious and moral people would exist to carry on the dream of a society which affirms that, "All people are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness." Those words were written by those who not only read the New Testament, but agreed that it contained words to live by. It is from this understanding that the Constitution was born. That document still lives only because the moral and religious still remain!
If one takes out the New Testament, then one will misunderstand the Constitution, thereby tampering with the very foundations upon which the United States of America stands. Graziano only knows what a "good world" is because of how the New Testament has shaped it. He is blind to the fact that without it, this nation would have never survived past it's first 100 years of existence.
All this is to say that I think Cousins is doing a great job! Graziano is just confused as to why that is good!
Monday, May 6, 2013
What is THE Gospel?
I received this email today from my father-in-law today:
--
--
Here’s a question for you. What is the gospel? Answer that
first, and then go to Mk. 1:14-15.
Here’s something else I found. Matt. 3:1-2 and Matt. 4:17.
Interesting, huh?
--
I looked up the verses and noticed that the "gospel" seemed to refer to coming of God's Kingdom on Earth. But instead of rehashing all of my thoughts, I'll just share with you my response.
-- My Response --
The Kingdom of Heaven is near, we all have the opportunity of
becoming its citizens, and his Kingdom will endure forever and ever!
Amen! This is real Gospel!
--
I looked up the verses and noticed that the "gospel" seemed to refer to coming of God's Kingdom on Earth. But instead of rehashing all of my thoughts, I'll just share with you my response.
-- My Response --
In the Greek, the word "Gospel" is commonly defined as a verb
(Preaching the Good News) or noun (The Good News). Typically we as
Christians equate the "Gospel" as the general story of Christ's death
and resurrection, but as you have pointed out that isn't the whole of
"The Gospel," though it is certainly good news in part. Within the
contexts of the passages which you cited above, "The Good News" for the
Jews would certainly have been that the Kingdom of Heaven was drawing
near. For them it might have meant that Israel's line of David was being
restored ultimately throwing off the Roman Empire's grip over them. But
regardless of how they might have understood it, John's Baptism was
preparing them for the establishment of God's Kingdom through Christ,
and this is very Good News indeed.
So "What is the Gospel?" I think it is that, through
Jesus Christ, God's Kingdom is nearer to us now than ever before. It is
so close that just through believing in Christ's resurrection, we not
only have access to, but also complete citizenship in that Kingdom! This
is gospel: "good news!" But neither does it stop there, because God's
Kingdom is still expanding through evangelism and will itself endure
forever (See Daniel 2:44). Then there is the return of Jesus Christ
which is also part of the "good news," though it doesn't stop
there either. The wedding feast of the Lamb as well as the New Heavens
and New Earth we look forward to as well.
--
I am not claiming that is "The Gospel" and therefore all encompassing of "The Good News" that our Christian Faith professes. It suffices to say, then, that "Gospel" is a term we use for "good news" as it pertains to God's plan for his people. Regardless of how painful that plan might turn out to be, it will always work for "the good of those who love Him and are called according to his purpose" (Romans 8:28).
Saturday, May 4, 2013
Reflections from Hearing Ravi Zacharias
Through the crowd of people cycling between information booths, sipping punch, and talking amongst themselves, I saw with my own eyes the man who has always served as a great inspiration to me. I received the email inviting me to the Minnesota Family Counsel's 30th Anniversary Dinner last month. The price of the dinner was enough for me to reach for the delete button, until I notice the name keynote speaker. My parents often listened to his weekly broadcast on Sunday mornings after church and I remember enjoying listening to him since I was little. With a story like his, it is no wonder he considered the greatest Christian apologist of our time. For the very first time, my eyes witnessed the beaming, genuine, welcoming smile of Ravi Zacharias.
It would take me hours to try and express the way his challenging stories, parables, and main points moved and challenged me, but there are a few thoughts that I will ponder for many days to come. As a minister, a concerned citizen, and a worker in God's Kingdom, it can be difficult to live in each of those spheres without forgetting the other. Many would say that we are of God's Kingdom, and therefore it gives us an excuse to not be involved in civil government structures. We can also get so involved in the civil structures, that we start to forget that we are citizens of another kingdom. Zacharias inspires me to keep working in all three spheres, because the work God has for me naturally fits in all three.
The Church must be involved in the political process, but if it does so without reaching out to the people of culture it will accomplish little. Look for example at the fight to preserve traditional marriage, to preserve the life of the unborn, or to protect our children from the dangers that come with searching the internet. The cause may be a righteous one, but if there is no contact with the lost among the opposition, it will become little more than a cultural tug-of-war based on who has the majority in Congress.
I am not saying that these causes are futile, or that the Church needs to get out of politics. In fact I would encourage you to vote and stay in contact with your elected officials. This, I believe is our civil duty. But, in order to change this culture, we should begin by venturing out of the walls of our churches and begin to gracefully and lovingly reach to our neighbors regardless of what side of the aisle they lean. We need to invite people into our homes regardless of their view on human sexuality. There is a God in Heaven who does not wish that co-worker of yours, who constantly teases you for your faith, to be cast from his presence.
What are your thoughts? Are we going to stand aside and expect civil structures to do the work of the Church? Or are we going to step in, as workers of another kingdom, as concerned citizens, and effective ministers to do the work of Jesus in our time?
It would take me hours to try and express the way his challenging stories, parables, and main points moved and challenged me, but there are a few thoughts that I will ponder for many days to come. As a minister, a concerned citizen, and a worker in God's Kingdom, it can be difficult to live in each of those spheres without forgetting the other. Many would say that we are of God's Kingdom, and therefore it gives us an excuse to not be involved in civil government structures. We can also get so involved in the civil structures, that we start to forget that we are citizens of another kingdom. Zacharias inspires me to keep working in all three spheres, because the work God has for me naturally fits in all three.
The Church must be involved in the political process, but if it does so without reaching out to the people of culture it will accomplish little. Look for example at the fight to preserve traditional marriage, to preserve the life of the unborn, or to protect our children from the dangers that come with searching the internet. The cause may be a righteous one, but if there is no contact with the lost among the opposition, it will become little more than a cultural tug-of-war based on who has the majority in Congress.
I am not saying that these causes are futile, or that the Church needs to get out of politics. In fact I would encourage you to vote and stay in contact with your elected officials. This, I believe is our civil duty. But, in order to change this culture, we should begin by venturing out of the walls of our churches and begin to gracefully and lovingly reach to our neighbors regardless of what side of the aisle they lean. We need to invite people into our homes regardless of their view on human sexuality. There is a God in Heaven who does not wish that co-worker of yours, who constantly teases you for your faith, to be cast from his presence.
What are your thoughts? Are we going to stand aside and expect civil structures to do the work of the Church? Or are we going to step in, as workers of another kingdom, as concerned citizens, and effective ministers to do the work of Jesus in our time?
Friday, April 26, 2013
From the Eyes and Ears of a Pharisee
"How is it that we and the Pharisees fast, but your disciples do not fast?" He spoke for all of us. My stomach was empty, and it constantly let me know, but that is the way of it. I am supposed to fast with no questions asked. Yet, this teacher, this Yeshua, who seemingly possesses an incredibly thorough understanding of our laws and customs, never seems to fast. Not to mention, his followers never seem to fast either.
"How can the guests of the bridegroom mourn while he is still with them," Yeshua answered, "The time will come when the bridegroom will be taken from them, then they will fast." Before I had time to ponder what he meant by this, he kept going!
"No one sews a patch of unshrunk cloth on an old garment, for the patch will pull away from the garment, making the tear worse." What did that have to do with fasting?
"Neither do men pour new wine into old wineskins. If they do, the skins will burst, the wine will run out and the wineskins will be ruined. No, they pour new wine into new wineskins, and both are preserved."
I left his talk mulling over those words. So strange and yet, for some reason, so vexingly profound! As a teacher of the Law, this shouldn't be hard for me to understand. It's such a simple question, "Why don't you fast?" And yet he never seems to address the subject at hand.
Fasting, patches, wineskins... I do not understand. Perhaps what the others are saying is true. This is a madman who is only seeking to confuse and agitate teachers of the Law while creating his own following. Yet, I can't get his strange teaching out of my mind! Fasting... patches... wineskins... Fasting... patches... winesk-
Wait... what if instead of looking at this solely from my understanding of those things, I were to turn my understanding of fasting. Yeshua was referring to fasting in the first place, right? Perhaps there is more to his words. I suppose it is time to ask myself, "what is fasting?"
I suppose it is one way of cleansing myself from all that is unclean. It is a form of purification, but we also fast in mourning to remind ourselves of the frailty of flesh. But are these the real reason for my fast? No, I fast because it is expected of me. I feel no more cleansed from my fast than I expect a pig would feel if it stopped eating for 40 days. I feel no sense of cleansing... no sense of...
Is that it? Am I the old wineskin? Am I the patch which refuses to shrink? Am I expecting to be preserved by my fast only to find that I am still decaying? If yes, then why? Am I not a pharisee; a teacher of the law, one chosen for the task of mediating The LORD's mercy on his people, Israel? Yet I feel... No I know, that I am nothing but an old, crusty, skin which no amount of ritual can keep from bursting when the cleansing wine of my fast pours right though me. I am not preserved, and neither is the meaning behind my fast. It is nothing. But should it not be something?
How then do I become like a new wineskin? How do I become like a cloth suitable to repair the garment? Perhaps at my next encounter with Yeshua, I shall ask him.
-From the Eyes of a Pharisee
"How can the guests of the bridegroom mourn while he is still with them," Yeshua answered, "The time will come when the bridegroom will be taken from them, then they will fast." Before I had time to ponder what he meant by this, he kept going!
"No one sews a patch of unshrunk cloth on an old garment, for the patch will pull away from the garment, making the tear worse." What did that have to do with fasting?
"Neither do men pour new wine into old wineskins. If they do, the skins will burst, the wine will run out and the wineskins will be ruined. No, they pour new wine into new wineskins, and both are preserved."
I left his talk mulling over those words. So strange and yet, for some reason, so vexingly profound! As a teacher of the Law, this shouldn't be hard for me to understand. It's such a simple question, "Why don't you fast?" And yet he never seems to address the subject at hand.
Fasting, patches, wineskins... I do not understand. Perhaps what the others are saying is true. This is a madman who is only seeking to confuse and agitate teachers of the Law while creating his own following. Yet, I can't get his strange teaching out of my mind! Fasting... patches... wineskins... Fasting... patches... winesk-
Wait... what if instead of looking at this solely from my understanding of those things, I were to turn my understanding of fasting. Yeshua was referring to fasting in the first place, right? Perhaps there is more to his words. I suppose it is time to ask myself, "what is fasting?"
I suppose it is one way of cleansing myself from all that is unclean. It is a form of purification, but we also fast in mourning to remind ourselves of the frailty of flesh. But are these the real reason for my fast? No, I fast because it is expected of me. I feel no more cleansed from my fast than I expect a pig would feel if it stopped eating for 40 days. I feel no sense of cleansing... no sense of...
Is that it? Am I the old wineskin? Am I the patch which refuses to shrink? Am I expecting to be preserved by my fast only to find that I am still decaying? If yes, then why? Am I not a pharisee; a teacher of the law, one chosen for the task of mediating The LORD's mercy on his people, Israel? Yet I feel... No I know, that I am nothing but an old, crusty, skin which no amount of ritual can keep from bursting when the cleansing wine of my fast pours right though me. I am not preserved, and neither is the meaning behind my fast. It is nothing. But should it not be something?
How then do I become like a new wineskin? How do I become like a cloth suitable to repair the garment? Perhaps at my next encounter with Yeshua, I shall ask him.
-From the Eyes of a Pharisee
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)